Legal Opinion

Braxton v. State of Tennessee

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided March 12, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00251Unknown

1Opinion

\UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION FREDERICK E. BRAXTON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) NO. 3:20-cv-00251 ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Frederick E. Braxton filed a pro se petition for the writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, asserting four claims. (Doc. No. 1). Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss the Petition as untimely (Doc. No. 10), and Petitioner filed a Response (Doc. No. 21). For the following reasons, one claim is not cognizable, three are untimely and not subject to an equitable exception, and this action…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API