Braxton v. State of Tennessee
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
\UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION FREDERICK E. BRAXTON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) NO. 3:20-cv-00251 ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Frederick E. Braxton filed a pro se petition for the writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, asserting four claims. (Doc. No. 1). Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss the Petition as untimely (Doc. No. 10), and Petitioner filed a Response (Doc. No. 21). For the following reasons, one claim is not cognizable, three are untimely and not subject to an equitable exception, and this action…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.