Flake Motors v. Huskins
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss
Plaintiffs in error will be referred to as “Flake Motors,” and defendant in error Huskins as “Huskins” or “claimant,” and the Industrial Commission as “Commission.”
From a judgment of the district court affirming an award of Commission in favor of Huskins and against Flake Motors, the latter prosecutes this writ of error.
Flake Motors was engaged in the business of buying and selling used automobiles, and for that purpose operated used car lots, including one at 324 Broadway, Denver, Colorado. Flake Motors contracted with G. S. Carter, doing business as Neon Maintenance Company, for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- American Radiator Co. v. FranzenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Meyer v. Lakewood Country ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
3Cited by2 opinions
- Denver Truck Exchange & State Compensation Insurance Fund v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Pioneer Construction Company v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963