Legal Opinion
Howmet Aluminum Corporation, a Subsidiary of Pechiney-Ugine-Kuhlmann Corporation v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company Howmet Aluminum Corporation, a Subsidiary of Pechiney-Ugine-Kuhlmann Corporation v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 4, 1981No. 81-1780PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
665 F.2d 476
HOWMET ALUMINUM CORPORATION, a subsidiary of
Pechiney-Ugine-Kuhlmann Corporation, Appellant
v.
HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY
HOWMET ALUMINUM CORPORATION, a subsidiary of
Pechiney-Ugine-Kuhlmann Corporation
v.
HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant.
Nos. 81-1780, 81-1781.
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Argued Nov. 17, 1981.
Decided Dec. 4, 1981.
Henry B. FitzPatrick, Jr. (argued), Liebert, Short, FitzPatrick & Lavin, Philadelphia, Pa., for Howmet Aluminum Corp.
M. Landon Spencer (argued), McWilliams & Sweeney, Philadelphia, Pa., for Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Penneys v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- West Republic Mining Co. v. Jones & LaughlinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- J. Purdy Cope Hotels Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Charles Blackledge v. Olga BlackledgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Browne v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998