Legal Opinion

Block v. City of West Palm Beach

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 27, 1940No. 9492PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to a Plan of Adjustment of appellee city’s debts, the holders of 93% of the indebtedness, accepted and received refunding bonds, issued August 1, 1936. Appellants are the holders of 188 of these bonds. As such holders, appellants sued the appellees, City and Cook & Company, alleging that the City, in abandonment and violation of the terms of the January 1, 1936, contract,1 under which the bonds were refunded, had dismissed proceedings in bankruptcy which it filed under Section 83, sub. j of the Bankruptcy Act to compel the 7% non-assenting bondholders to come…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Clarke v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Van Weel v. WinstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Folks v. County of MarionSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Hart v. Citizens' Insurance Co. of PittsburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. City of Miami v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Pasquel v. OwenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. All West Pet Supply Co. v. Hill's Pet Products DivisionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  4. United States v. Haynes School Dist. No. 8District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1951
  5. Becherer v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API