Legal Opinion

Von Thaden v. Arizona State Real Estate Commissioner

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 18, 1979No. Nos. 2 CA-CIV 3262, 2 CA-CIV 3269PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This is an action to recover money from the real estate recovery fund established by A.R.S. Sec. 32 — 2186. The issue here is whether Sungate Development Company (Sungate), a licensed real estate broker, was acting on its own behalf in property owned or controlled by it so as to exclude the funds from liability. The trial court found the fund liable. We do not agree.

The facts show that appellees Barber and Fleming deposited $16,789 as earnest money with Sungate for the purchase of a lot from Sungate which was to construct a house thereon. The Von Thadens deposited…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arizona Real Estate Department v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dent v. WinkleOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Brody v. AlfieriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API