Legal Opinion

John D. Lawrence v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1966No. 8371_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

This is a direct appeal by the appellant from his conviction for the robbery of a bank in Picher, Oklahoma, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a).

James Collins and Barbara Sandoval, who were jointly charged with appellant, had entered pleas of guilty prior to the trial of appellant, and it appears from the record that the two participated in the actual robbery of the bank. Appellant was not present during the course of the commission of the crime, and the question relating to him is whether or not he was guilty in aiding, abetting, and counseling the commission of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Throckmorton v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Billy Joe Helton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  5. Henry Maestas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. Edwin Sanchez, United States of America v. Gregorio Rosario, United States of America v. Rafael SanchezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Joseph Aiuppa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  5. Norman Lee Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API