Legal Opinion

Joseph Aiuppa v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1968No. 9243_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

On first appeal from a jury-waived trial and conviction for unlawful possession and transportation of migratory birds, 16 U.S.C. § 703, we remanded this case for a new trial with directions to suppress, as evidence, contraband [560 frozen mourning doves] seized as the fruits of an unlawful search. Aiuppa v. United States, 10 Cir., 338 F.2d 146. On this appeal from a jury conviction and sentence on the same counts Aiuppa asserts numerous other grounds for reversal. After careful consideration of each point raised, we affirm the judgment.

Aiuppa first contends here that the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. David Hall and W. W. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  2. Williamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Edward Byron Hale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Charles P. BourassaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  5. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API