Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Steele

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 6, 1911No. 477PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Rule to show cause why a judgment entered upon a transcript from a justice of the peace, should not be stricken from the records of the Superior Court and vacated. The facts and questions presented appear in the opinion of the court. '

1Opinion of the Court

Rice, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

This was an argument on rule to show cause why a judgment should not be stricken from the records of this court and vacated.

The transcript from the justice of the peace, upon which the judgment in this court was entered, sets forth that the “attorney for Rebecca Goldstein, the plaintiff in this action, makes and files an affidavit to the demand and that there is danger of said plaintiff losing the benefit of process by-delay.” Upon this affidavit the justice of the peace on the twenty-seventh day of February, A. D. 1911, issued summons to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BaileyNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. HindererSuperior Court of Delaware · 1920
  2. McCoy v. HickmanSuperior Court of Delaware · 1940
  3. Weintraub v. RudnickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1928
  4. Charles Tire Co. v. OwensSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API