Legal Opinion
Weintraub v. Rudnick
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided October 5, 1928No. 496PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rodney, J.,
delivering the opinion of the court:
The preliminary question as to the propriety of the present form of proceeding may be briefly considered. This is now no new question, but this court in Goldstein v. Steele, 3 Boyce 125, 80 A. 522, and Jones v. Hinderer, 7 Boyce 516, 108 A. 737, determined that a motion to strike off the judgment is a proper proceeding where the lack of jurisdiction of the justice appeared from the transcript.
The remaining question before the court is a very narrow one. There is no doubt but that in New Castle County the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. Algona Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Pendergast v. Fostoria Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1919
- Escavaille v. StephensTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Jones v. HindererSuperior Court of Delaware · 1920
- Goldstein v. SteeleSuperior Court of Delaware · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McCoy v. HickmanSuperior Court of Delaware · 1940
- E. J. Hollingsworth Co. v. CesariniSuperior Court of Delaware · 1957
- Charles Tire Co. v. OwensSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936