Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Libersat

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1967No. 2136PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This is an action on a promissory note. The defense is failure or lack of consideration.

The plaintiff is the payee and holder of a promissory note issued jointly by the defendant and his former wife, Mary Alice Toups LeBlanc, who is a daughter of the plaintiff. The note is dated May 24,\1961, made out in the amount of $4,000.00, payable on or before five years, with four percent interest accruing from maturity date and ten percent attorney’s fees.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff on the merits and from the denial of the defendant’s motion for a new trial, the defendant has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Orlando v. PolitoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  2. Bond v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Paletou v. SobelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Penn v. BurkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  5. Moore Steel, Inc. v. Clear Lite Window Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. LeBlanc v. Consolidated Aluminum Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Chrysler Credit Corporation v. BreauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Toranto v. CopelandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Brister v. Louisiana Fire InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API