Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City of Hot Springs v. Creviston

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 1986No. 85-237Published

1Concurrence

Jack Holt, Jr., Justice,

concurring. I join with the court’s supplemental opinion, issued upon the denial of the Petition for Rehearing. However, I consider it appropriate to note that certain petitioners in amicus curiae briefs ask us to rule on several collateral matters, primarily concerning Arkansas revenue bonds issued in accordance with amendment 20 to the Constitution of the State of Arkansas, and the constitutional aspects of bond refunding by a municipality without prior voter approval.

These issues are properly not resolved by the majority opinion, however, I think an explanation for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDonald v. BowenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Hogan v. BrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. McCuen v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API