Watts v. Brewer
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
This interlocutory appeal was permitted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (interlocutory review of an “order [that] may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation....”). Being reviewed is an order that the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition of Carl Dewayne Watts, Mississippi prisoner # 18202, is timely. In that regard, at issue is whether the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s (AEDPA) one-year limitations period, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), was tolled, under § 2244(d)(2), between the Mississippi Supreme Court’s denial of discretionary review and issuance…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ker'sean Ramey v. Lorie Davis, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Ramey v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
- Cruz v. Director, TDCJ-CIDDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2021
- Dickerson v. CainDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2024
- Lewis v. Washington County, MississippiDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2024