Legal Opinion
Ramey v. Davis
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided July 9, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:13-CV-43PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kenneth M. Hoyt, United States District Judge
Ker'sean Olajuwa Ramey, a Texas inmate incarcerated under a capital conviction and death sentence, filed a federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus on November 13, 2013. (Dkt. No. 7). Ramey alleges that constitutional error infected his trial with unfairness. Having considered Ramey's claims, the state court record, the pleadings, the evidence, and the applicable law, the Court now finds that Ramey is not entitled to federal habeas relief for the reasons provided herein.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On December 17, 2005, the State of Texas…
2Cases cited124 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ker'sean Ramey v. Lorie Davis, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Ramey v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Briones v. Director, TDCJ-CIDDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
- Hutto, III v. TaylorDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2021