Legal Opinion

Coerber v. Rath

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 11, 1967No. 22686PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kelley

This matter is here on writ of error whereby the defendants below (Coerbers) are seeking to reverse the trial court’s refusal to set aside a default judgment entered August 19, 1966, in favor of the plaintiffs below (Raths).

The trial court was confronted with a most unusual, shameful and difficult situation, as will be seen from a development of the facts. Hopefully, it is one that will never be repeated.

The plaintiffs’ claims arose out of the alleged tortious conduct of the defendant Charles Coerber, an employee of defendant Carl Coerber, while in the act of repossessing the plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burlington Ditch, Reservoir & Land Co. v. Fort Morgan Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  2. Zika v. EckelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  3. People ex rel. Attorney General v. MorganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Craig v. RiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Buckmiller v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Dudley v. KellerColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Tyler v. Adams County Department of Social Services Ex Rel. TylerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. Weaver Construction Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API