In re the Bond Issuance of the Greater Wenatchee Regional Events Center Public Facilities District
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentFairhurst, J.
¶44 (dissenting) — I dissent because the proposed contingent loan agreement (CLA) does not create a debt of the city of Wenatchee (City) within the meaning of our constitutional and statutory limits. The lead opinion invents an entirely new legal analysis to achieve a contrary result.
ANALYSIS
¶45 The primary issue in this case is whether the proposed CLA between the Greater Wenatchee Regional Events Center Public Facilities District (District) and the City would constitute “indebtedness” for the City within its relevant constitutional and statutory meaning. The “risk of loss” theory announced…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Washington Federation of State Employees v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Winston v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Quill v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Department of Ecology v. State Finance CommitteeWashington Supreme Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.