Legal Opinion

Beaufort Truck Growers Ass'n v. Seaboard Air Line

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 16, 1924No. 11426PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

These cases were heard together, marked A and B.

The exceptions in case A are:

“First Exception. It is respectfully submitted that his Honor, the trial Judge erred in admitting, over the objection of the defendant, the testimony of the witness Boiler; the error being that the testimony was given from a memorandum made by a person other than the witness, was hearsay testimony, and was incompetent.
“Second Exception. It is respectfully submitted that his Honor, the trial Judge, erred in failing to strike out, upon the motion of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gwathmey v. Foor Hotel CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Copeland Co. v. Davis, Dir. Gen.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beaufort Truck Growers' Ass'n v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Beaufort Truck Growers' Ass'n v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Hughes v. Palatine Insurance CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API