Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hughes v. Palatine Insurance Company

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 13, 1924No. 11631Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Acting Associate Justice P. F. Henderson

(concurring) : Before the reargument herein was ordered an opinion by Mr. Justice Watts, concurred in by Mr. Justice Fraser, was filed ordering the affirmance of the judgments herein, and a dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice Cothran, concurred in by Mr. Justice Marion, was likewise filed, which held that there should be a reversal. In view of this contrariety of opinion, I was designated to participate in the rehearing, and in the resultant decision of these appeals.

Under these circumstances, I shall not attempt to discuss all of the somewhat…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Edgefield Mfg. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Gwathmey v. Foor Hotel CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  3. McCarty v. Piedmont Mutual Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  4. Madden & Co. v. Phoenix Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  5. Copeland Co. v. Davis, Dir. Gen.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API