Legal Opinion

Lundeby v. Doty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, as resettled, denying plaintiff’s *1106motion to strike from the answer the fourth separate defense, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the authority of Van Wormer v. Arnold (255 App. Div. 233). It appears from the pleadings, and is assumed by the parties, that at the time of the accident the plaintiff’s intestate and the defendant were coemployees. The relationship of employer and employee did not exist. The word “ employed,” as used in the fifth paragraph of the complaint, is deemed to mean “ engaged.” It was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wormer v. ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Romaneck v. BauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frick v. HortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API