Legal Opinion

Frick v. Horton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant administratrix appeals from the denial of her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to her on the ground that the action, which is to recover damages for decedent’s death, occurring in the course of his employment through the alleged negligence of movant’s intestate, his fellow employee, is barred by section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

It has been adjudicated that decedent’s death was an industrial accident and his widow and minor child, as dependents, have been given a workmen’s compensation award. (Matter of Frick v. Rouse Constr. Corp., 19 A D 2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wormer v. ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Lundeby v. DotyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Burgess Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Sauve v. WinfreeAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Weinberg v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API