Legal Opinion
Rothe v. Astrue
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 22, 2011No. Civil Action 10-0323 (ESH)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking a reversal of defendant’s decision to deny disability insurance benefits. In the alternative, plaintiff seeks a remand to the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) for a new administrative hearing. The issue presented is whether the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) based his decision to deny benefits on an adequately developed record that contained substantial evidence to support such a denial. The Court holds that this finding is based on sufficient…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Valere Poulin v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Davis v. HecklerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Florida Gas Transmission Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Beletzuy Monzon v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Tara R. v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2026