Legal Opinion

Lindemulder v. Shoup

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 151, Calendar No. 36,418PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants, filing a declaration containing three counts, in addition to the common counts in assumpsit. The first count alleges plaintiff was fraudulently induced to purchase for $500 an interest in the capital stock of a corporation which defendants represented they were about to organize to acquire oil and gas leases and to drill and operate oil wells in Muskegon county; that he relied upon these representations and they were not true; that defendants did not organize such corporation, did not incorporate, and did not issue stock therein, and plaintiff received nothing for…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. Porter Royalty Pool, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gales v. WeldonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Moffit v. SederlundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Oakley v. RosenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Garbo v. Hilleary Franchise Systems, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API