Lindemulder v. Shoup
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.
Plaintiff sued defendants, filing a declaration containing three counts, in addition to the common counts in assumpsit. The first count alleges plaintiff was fraudulently induced to purchase for $500 an interest in the capital stock of a corporation which defendants represented they were about to organize to acquire oil and gas leases and to drill and operate oil wells in Muskegon county; that he relied upon these representations and they were not true; that defendants did not organize such corporation, did not incorporate, and did not issue stock therein, and plaintiff received nothing for…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Hathaway v. Porter Royalty Pool, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Gales v. WeldonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Moffit v. SederlundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Oakley v. RosenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Garbo v. Hilleary Franchise Systems, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.