Tompkins v. George Rinner Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentSchroeder, J.
The court’s decision permits an outrageous confiscation of one person’s property and gives it to another without just cause and in violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution.
The feeble effort of the appellees in their brief to uphold the trial court and meet the onslaught of the appellant has been disastrous.
It may be conceded this court by a long line of decisions has repeatedly held that the workmen’s compensation act establishes a procedure of its own covering every phase of the right to compensation, and it has been said such procedure is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Teague v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Tompkins v. George Rinner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Scammahorn v. Gibraltar Savings & Loan Assn.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- First National Bank v. ElliottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.