Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 7, 1899No. 11029PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Cowley district court; J. A. Burnette, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The'opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J. :

The First National Bank of" Fort Scott recovered a judgment against Charles H. Elliott for $3205.89, and the court having refused to stay the execution of the judgment an execution was at once issued which was levied on the property of the defendant. To prevent the enforcement of the judgment 'until a review of the same could be had, the following stipulation was entered into and signed by the attorneys of the respective parties :

“Whereas, on the 30th day of April, 1892, in said district court above named, said plaintiff recovered a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The BANK OF THE UNITED STATES v. the Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Ex parte Walter Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Keck v. AllenderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Grant v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Southern Kansas Railway Co. v. PaveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. George Rinner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Coker & Bellamy v. RicheyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Jenkins v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Denning v. YountSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Mossein v. Empire State Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API