Sigma Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
Plaintiff D & L Supply Company (“D & L” or “plaintiff’) and defendant-intervenors U.S. Foundry & Manufacturing Co., Alhambra Foundry, Inc., Allegheny Foundry Co., Bing-ham & Taylor Division, Virginia Industries, Inc., Charlotte Pipe & Foundry Co., Deeter Foundry Inc., East Jordan Iron Works, Inc., LeBaron Foundry Inc., Municipal Castings, Inc., Neenah Foundry Co., Opelika Foundry Co., Inc., Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc., Vulcan Foundry, Inc., Campbell Foundry Co. and Pinkerton Foundry Inc. (“defendant-interve-nors” or “domestic industry”) challenge as unsupported by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Sigma Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Sigma Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
3Cited by3 opinions
- Writing Instrument Manufacturers Ass'n v. U.S. Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Sigma Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Sigma Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997