Legal Opinion

Sigma Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 1, 1995No. Court No. 91-02-00154. Slip Op. No. 95-102PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TSOUCALAS, Judge:

Plaintiff D & L Supply Company (“D & L” or “plaintiff’) and defendant-intervenors U.S. Foundry & Manufacturing Co., Alhambra Foundry, Inc., Allegheny Foundry Co., Bing-ham & Taylor Division, Virginia Industries, Inc., Charlotte Pipe & Foundry Co., Deeter Foundry Inc., East Jordan Iron Works, Inc., LeBaron Foundry Inc., Municipal Castings, Inc., Neenah Foundry Co., Opelika Foundry Co., Inc., Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc., Vulcan Foundry, Inc., Campbell Foundry Co. and Pinkerton Foundry Inc. (“defendant-interve-nors” or “domestic industry”) challenge as unsupported by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  3. Sigma Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
  4. Sigma Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Writing Instrument Manufacturers Ass'n v. U.S. Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  2. Sigma Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
  3. Sigma Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API