Legal Opinion

Sigma Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 23, 1995No. Slip Op. 95-95. Court No. 92-04-00283PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TSOUCALAS, Judge:

Plaintiff Guangdong Metals & Minerals Import and Export Corporation (“Guangdong”) and defendant-intervenors U.S. Foundry & Manufacturing Co., Alhambra Foundry, Inc., Allegheny Foundry Co., Bingham & Taylor Division, Virginia Industries, Inc., Charlotte Pipe & Foundry Co., Deeter Foundry Inc., East Jordan Iron Works, Inc., Lebaron Foundry Inc., Municipal Castings, Inc., Neenah Foundry Co., Opelika Foundry Co., Inc., Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. and Vulcan Foundry, Inc. (“defendant-intervenors” or “domestic industry”) challenge as unsupported by substantial evidence and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  3. Tehnoimportexport, UCF America Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  4. Sigma Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shandong Huarong General Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  2. Writing Instrument Manufacturers Ass'n v. U.S. Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  3. Sigma Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
  4. Sigma Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  5. D & L Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API