Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Bank of Waynesboro

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 24, 1922No. 13199PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

The bank sued a corporation as maker and the plaintiff in error and others as indorsers upon a promissory note. The name of the maker was signed at-the foot of the instrument, and the names of the plaintiff in error and other defendants were signed upon the back. The note contained an assignment of certain stock certificates and notes receivable as collateral security, and the following provision: “ With the further right to said bank to call for additional security, and, on failure to respond, to declare this note due, payable, and collectible.” Before maturity the bank, in writing, called…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McMillan v. Heard National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Sibley v. American Exchange National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Ridley v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Booth v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Preston v. DozierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank of Madison v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Smith v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API