Legal Opinion

D.L.H. v. R.W.L.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, President Judge.

¶ 1 R.W.L. appeals from an order, entered after an evidentiary hearing, finding that Appellee D.L.H. is not estopped from pursuing a child support action against Appellant. For the reasons set forth below, we quash the appeal.

¶2 Appellee filed a support complaint alleging that Appellant is the father of her son, who was born on August 24, 1989. The parties submitted to blood tests which showed a 99.58% likelihood that Appellant is the child’s biological father. The court scheduled a support conference. Appellant then filed a motion to continue the support conference…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. TrojakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Fish v. BehersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Freedman v. McCandlessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Williams v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Paulshock v. BonomoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API