Supply v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kao, Judge:
Certain imported coffee-brewing devices were classified by the collector of customs within the provisions of paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dee. 150, T.D. 54108, for articles wholly or in chief value of steel, not specially provided for, and, accordingly, were assessed with duty at the rate of 21 per centum ad valorem, or 20 per centum ad valorem, depending upon the date of entry.
*281It is claimed in the protests enumerated in the schedule, annexed to this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- United States v. Van Bourgondien Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- General Systems Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- H. T. Kennedy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.