Legal Opinion

Reed v. Ringsby

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1952No. 33190PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

In this action the trial court had, by decree which became final, declared that a trust existed in a “substantial part” of an estate. A declaration of trust was filed to which objections were made. The trial court held that the amount declared to be held in trust was in compliance with the decree; refused to remove the trustees; and made an allowance of attorney fees. Defendant Forrest Harnly appeals. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

This case originated as an action to quiet title to real estate. It is now in essence a contest between the residuary beneficiaries of a will who are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burnham v. BennisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Clark v. FleischmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Kirk v. VohlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Pavel v. HotovyNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Estate of StuchlikNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Scully v. ScullyNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Williams v. National Bank of Commerce Trust & Savings Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Johnson v. Johnson Ex Rel. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Root v. Morning View Cemetery AssociationNebraska Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API