Legal Opinion

Nor-Cal Moving Services v. Paylocity Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 23, 2025No. 3:25-cv-02085Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOR-CAL MOVING SERVICES, Case No. 25-cv-02085-RFL Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND PAYLOCITY CORP., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendant. Plaintiff Nor-Cal Moving Services (“Nor-Cal”) alleges that Defendant Paylocity Corporation (“Paylocity”) breached its contractual obligations to provide accurate and legally compliant payroll processing services. Specifically, Nor-Cal contends that Paylocity implemented an unlawful time-rounding policy in violation of California wage and hour…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Tatum C. Singletary v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API