Legal Opinion

Haster v. Blair

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1940No. Civ. 6421PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.

This action was brought to -recover possession of certain mining machinery, tools and equipment. Findings were made in favor of plaintiff upon all issues, and judgment was entered in his favor for such possession, together with damages for the detention of said property. Defendants Blair and Metallic Mines, a corporation, appeal from the judgment, and also from an order denying their motion for new trial.

In 1929, J. W. Newell held under lease from A. G. Metz, certain mining property known as the “Longfellow Group”. He was also, at that time, the owner of an adjoining claim known as the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Higgins v. EvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Brown v. O'NealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Krum v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Schoenfeld v. NorbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Mettelka v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API