Mettelka v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARRY-DEAL, J.
This petition for writ of mandate raises the issue of whether one co-owner of a vehicle may negligently entrust the co-owned vehicle to another co-owner. The issue arises because the superior court barred a negligent entrustment cause of action for the sole reason that the defendants’ car was co-owned by the driver and his father. We conclude that a cause of action was stated for negligent entrustment by the father.
Petitioner’s original complaint named Joseph Ralph Greco, Jr., and Doe defendants and alleged that defendants “and each of them, so carelessly and negligently…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johns v. ScobieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Krum v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Syah v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Ochoa v. McCushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. ForbathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Zedella v. GibsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Casebolt ex rel. Casebolt v. CowanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Osborn v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Kevin HINES; Cathy Zampa, as Guardian Ad Litem for Stephanie Hines, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Neale v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.