Legal Opinion

Wright v. American Cyanamid Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 9, 1999No. 97-1322PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Chief Justice.

The main question here is whether plaintiff Orville Wright’s claims against defendant American Cyanamid Company, concerning the effectiveness of defendant’s herbicide on certain weeds in plaintiffs farm fields, are preempted by the federal insecticide, fungicide, and rodenticide act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. § 136-136y (1994). The district court concluded that plaintiffs claims were preempted, or not supported by evidence, and therefore entered summary judgment in favor of defendant. Upon our review, we affirm.

I. Background facts and proceedings.

Plaintiff Orville Wright is a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Worm v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. Gina Lowe v. Sporicidin InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. Donald Welchert, Rick Welchert, Jerry Welchert, Deborah Welchert v. American Cyanamid, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. Krause v. KrauseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. John Goodpaster v. Schwan's Home Service, Inc. and Todd Swanson, Individually and in His Corporate CapacitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. Theresa Huck v. Wyeth, Inc. D/B/A Wyeth Schwarz Pharma, Inc. and Pliva, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. Racing Ass'n of Central Iowa v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  4. Swartzendruber v. SchimmelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  5. Jarman v. United Industries Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API