Legal Opinion
Jarman v. United Industries Corp.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided March 17, 2000No. Civ.A.4:99CV40LNPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TOM S. LEE, District Judge.
Defendants United Industries Corp., UIC Holdings, LLC, Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund IV, LP, Thomas H. Lee Equity Advisors, IV, LLC, Thomas H. Lee Capital, LLC, Thomas H. Lee Company, David C. Pratt, Richard A. Bender, William P. Johnson and Daniel J. Johnston have moved, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff Russell A. Jarman has responded in opposition to the motion and the court, having considered the parties’ memoranda of authorities,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Briehl v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Rule v. Fort Dodge Animal Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.