Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Juras

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 12, 1971No. Civ. 70-621PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before KILKENNY, Circuit Judge, and BELLONI and GOODWIN, District Judges. ALFRED T. GOODWIN, District Judge:

This class action by welfare recipients challenges regulations under which the Oregon Public Welfare Division recoups public-assistance overpayments from current welfare grants.

Plaintiffs assert that the regulations are unconstitutional and inconsistent with the Social Security Act. They demand injunctive and declaratory relief. A three-judge court was convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281, 2284.

This court has jurisdiction of the subject matter under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1343(3) and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Wyman v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Cooper v. LaupheimerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Gunn v. BlumNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Clyde Jacquet v. Roy E. WesterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Redding v. Burlington County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  5. Steere v. State, Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API