Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Sorlien
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 24, 1980No. 48721Published
1Opinion of the Court
299 N.W.2d 123 (1980)
Susan Louise PETERSON, Appellant,
v.
Paul SORLIEN, Respondent,
Norman Jungclaus, et al., Respondents,
Michele Perkins, Respondent.
No. 48721.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
October 24, 1980.
Ranum, Quackenbush & Burke and James H. Ranum, Minneapolis, for appellant.
Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett and Jeffrey R. Brooke, Minneapolis, for Sorlien.
Joseph W. Parris, Hector, for Jungclaus et al.
Wasserman & Lewis and Mark S. Wasserman, Minneapolis, for Perkins.
Heard before SHERAN, C. J., and OTIS, PETERSON, KELLY, TODD, YETKA and MAXWELL, JJ., and considered and decided by the court en…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.