Legal Opinion

McEachen v. Richmond

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1957No. Civ. 8997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

Plaintiff, in the trial court, has appealed from a judgment entered upon a defense verdict in a personal injury action. Respondents did not take a cross appeal from that portion of the judgment entered upon an adverse verdict on their cross-complaint.

The accident out of which this action arose occurred at night at an intersection of a two-laned state highway and a county road. Both appellant and respondents were proceeding north on the state highway. Respondent’s vehicle was being driven by Elizabeth Richmond, who will hereinafter be referred to as the respondent. She was following a truck…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. George Pepperdine FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Ornales v. WiggerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Jensen v. MinardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Nevis v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Graf v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Edgett v. FairchildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Hullander v. McIntyreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  4. McLinn v. Kodiak Electric Association, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API