Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Keiser

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 24, 1990No. 7215PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is the defendant’s appeal from the trial court’s order opening a stipulated judgment1 and releasing funds escrowed pursuant thereto. The defendant claims that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to open the judgment because more than four months had elapsed since entry of that judgment.2 We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

This appeal arises out of an action for specific performance of a contract by which the plaintiff was to purchase certain real estate from the defendant. At an earlier stage, we dismissed the defendant’s appeal for lack of a final judgment. The Supreme Court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Kenworthy v. KenworthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Celanese Fiber v. Pic Yarns, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Solomon v. KeiserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Richards v. RichardsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Yeong Gil Kim v. MagnottaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. TarroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API