Legal Opinion

Geiger v. ENAP, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 20, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to declare the parties’ rights in certain escrowed funds, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), dated July 15, 1998, as (1) denied that branch of his cross motion which was for summary judgment upon his fifth cause of action insofar as asserted against the defendant ENAP, Inc., (2) granted the motion of the defendant ENAP, Inc., for summary judgment, and (3) upon granting summary judgment, directed the entry of a judgment declaring that ENAP, Inc., was entitled…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Becker v. FaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Bier Pension Plan Trust v. Estate of SchneiersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Congregation Ohavei Shalom, Inc. v. Comyns Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arlona Limited Partnership v. 8th of January Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Mackler v. BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Central Equities Credit Corp. v. B&N Properties, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Oppenheimer AMT-Free Municipals v. ACA Financial Guaranty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Oppenheimer AMT-Free Municipals v. ACA Financial Guaranty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API