Commonwealth v. Ferrara
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, J.
These are appeals under G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33H. The defendants had been indicted and tried for the murder of George Pratt, and a jury returned verdicts of guilty of manslaughter against both defendants.
The defendants argue multiple assignments of error. We have concluded that they must have a new trial by reason of constitutional error in the denials of their motions to be allowed to use, in cross-examination, records of the juvenile offenses of a witness introduced by the Commonwealth.
We have considered only such other assignments of error as are likely to have a bearing on the new trials.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. BohannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. HaywoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.