Legal Opinion

Carr v. Williams

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Leavenworth District Court. The opinion contains a full statement of the pleadings, and facts. The district court, at the February Term 1875, gave judgment in favor of Williams and Stanton, defendants, against Carr, plaintiff, and the plaintiff brings the case here on error.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

'Valentine, J.:

This was an action on three promissory notes, and to foreclose a vendor’s lien on certain real estate, for the purchase of which real estate said promissory notes were given. The facts of the case, stated in brief, are substantially as follows: On May 12th 1871, the plaintiff Carr owned said real estate, and sold the same to the defendant Williams for $1,280, receiving $320 thereof in cash, and the balance in three promissory notes each for $320, and due in one, two, and three years, respectively. Carr gave no deed for the land, but gave…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ely v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Coleman v. ColemanArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Colvin v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  4. Thackeray v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Cutwright v. Union Savings & Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API