Legal Opinion

Watson v. Deaconess Waltham Hospital

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 10, 2001No. CIV.A. 00-10583-WGYPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOUNG, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

A. Summary of Amended Complaint

The plaintiff, Larkin D. Watson, IV (“Watson”), has brought this action against his former employer, Deaconess Waltham Hospital (“Deaconess”), pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. 1 Watson seeks restitution for breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA § 404(a), 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a). 2 Am. Compl. ¶ 1.

B. Procedural Posture and Relevant Legal Standard

On February 9, 2001, Deaconess moved for summary judgment on Watson’s claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Beddall v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. Concha v. LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Watson v. Deaconess Waltham HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Radford Trust v. First Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  3. J.E. Pierce Apothecary, Inc. v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  4. Ellis v. Fidelity Management Trust Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  5. Green v. ExxonMobil Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API