Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Progreso Development Co. v. Wisconsin Real Estate Brokers Board

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

A determination of the issues raised upon this appeal requires a consideration of the so-called Wisconsin real estate brokers’ law, being ch. 136, Stats. 1929. The material parts of the law are printed in the margin.1

*159The act specifically provides that a corporation may be a broker. The relator, although a foreign corporation, having been licensed to do business in the state of Wisconsin, is entitled to the same privileges and rights in that respect as a domestic corporation. While the state may exclude foreign corporations, when once admitted they have the same rights and are entitled to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wisconsin Inspection Bureau v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State ex rel. Moreland v. WhitfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Lutcher & Moore Lumber Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. State ex rel. Wood County v. Dodge CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ball v. McPheeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Batty v. Arizona State Dental BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Ford v. Wisconsin Real Estate Examining BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State Ex Rel. Board of Education v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. United Gas, Coke & Chemical Workers of America, Local 18 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API