State ex rel. Progreso Development Co. v. Wisconsin Real Estate Brokers Board
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
A determination of the issues raised upon this appeal requires a consideration of the so-called Wisconsin real estate brokers’ law, being ch. 136, Stats. 1929. The material parts of the law are printed in the margin.1
*159The act specifically provides that a corporation may be a broker. The relator, although a foreign corporation, having been licensed to do business in the state of Wisconsin, is entitled to the same privileges and rights in that respect as a domestic corporation. While the state may exclude foreign corporations, when once admitted they have the same rights and are entitled to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Inspection Bureau v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. Moreland v. WhitfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Lutcher & Moore Lumber Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- State ex rel. Wood County v. Dodge CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ball v. McPheeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Batty v. Arizona State Dental BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Ford v. Wisconsin Real Estate Examining BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Board of Education v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
- United Gas, Coke & Chemical Workers of America, Local 18 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.