Legal Opinion

FOUNDERS KITCHEN & BATH, INC. v. ALEXANDER Et Al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 23, 2015No. A15A1262PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MCFADDEN, Judge.

This is a materialman’s lien case in which the trial court granted a defense motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the parties are in privity of contract and thus the complaint is barred by the 365-day time limit imposed by OCGA § 44-14-361.1 (a) (3). But contrary to the trial court’s finding, there exist genuine issues of material fact as to whether the parties are in privity of contract and whether the time limit provided by OCGA § 44-14-361.1 (a) (3) applies to the complaint in this case. Accordingly, we reverse.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Thompson v. EzorSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  3. GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. ClackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  4. Few v. Capitol Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  5. Bradley v. WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cook Sales, Inc. v. Concrete Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
  2. Daniel Gryder v. Trey ConleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  3. Optum Construction Group, LLC v. City Electric Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
  4. Sunil Vatave v. Canopy Workforce Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API