Wardle v. MILLER
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
The question in this case is whether the court could say, as a matter of law, that the notice by an insured of an accident inflicting injury upon another was given to the liability insurer “as soon as practicable” as required by the policy. The material facts were undisputed. Hence, the question involved was necessarily one of law for the court to decide. The opinion of Judge Flood fully justifies the affirmative answer given for the court below.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Brakeman v. Potomac InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Frey v. Security Insurance Company of HartfordDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Maize v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1964
- Brakeman v. Potomac InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.