Legal Opinion

People v. Pavia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 22, 2014No. 2012-08043PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Meyer J.), dated August 15, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In determining a defendant’s risk level pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C [hereinafter SORA]), “[a] downward departure from a sex offender’s presumptive risk level generally is only warranted where there exists a mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is not otherwise…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. RomeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. KachatovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. MorrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. People v. BarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. CorrentiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. LeshchenkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API