Legal Opinion
In Re Clarke
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 7, 1996No. 95-BG-1792PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
This matter is before the court on the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) that respondent, Ernesto Clarke, be disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, based on the Board’s finding that respondent’s misappropriation of client and third-party funds and professional conduct violated several disciplinary rules. We agree with the Board’s recommendation and order respondent disbarred.
I
On December 27, 1994, Bar Counsel charged respondent, Ernesto Clarke, an attorney admitted to practice law in the District of Columbia, with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Matter of JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- In Re TempleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Matter of WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re PelsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re BettisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re TidwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re HuberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re ThomasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re AsherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.