Thomas Ingrassia v. Carol Dicknette
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BENTON, Circuit Judge.
Thomas J. Ingrassia, a civilly-committed individual, sued Carol A. Dickneite, Jay W. Englehart, Alan W. Blake, Beth Weinkein and Mary Beth Rowe, alleging a violation of his constitutional right to adequate nutrition under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied defendants qualified immunity. They appeal. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms in part, reverses in part, and remands.
I
Ingrassia was civilly committed to the Missouri Sexual Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment Services (SORTS) facility. In 2001, he escaped. Apprehended in 2003, he…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Kevin Scott Karsjens v. Tony LoureyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Homestar Prop. Solutions, LLC v. Safeguard Props., LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Nelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Benner v. St. Paul Pub. Sch.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Kelley v. KaniosDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.