Legal Opinion

Thomas Ingrassia v. Carol Dicknette

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 13, 2016No. 14-3358PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Circuit Judge.

Thomas J. Ingrassia, a civilly-committed individual, sued Carol A. Dickneite, Jay W. Englehart, Alan W. Blake, Beth Weinkein and Mary Beth Rowe, alleging a violation of his constitutional right to adequate nutrition under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied defendants qualified immunity. They appeal. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms in part, reverses in part, and remands.

I

Ingrassia was civilly committed to the Missouri Sexual Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment Services (SORTS) facility. In 2001, he escaped. Apprehended in 2003, he…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Kevin Scott Karsjens v. Tony LoureyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. Homestar Prop. Solutions, LLC v. Safeguard Props., LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
  3. Nelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
  4. Benner v. St. Paul Pub. Sch.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
  5. Kelley v. KaniosDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API