Legal Opinion

In re Brito

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Question Reserved.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, by

Judd, C.J.

The case comes to us upon questions reserved by Mr. Justice Preston, as follows:

1. Does the mittimus disclose any offense for which the prisoner may be punished ?

2. If yes ; is the punishment inflicted upon the prisoner legal under the statute of the last session of the Legislature, regulating the importation and sale of opium ?

The mittimus in question is from the Police Court of Honolulu, dated 16th March, 1887. It is entitled in the usual way, addressed to the Marshal, and recites that whereas Manuel Brito has this day been convicted in our Police Court of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hawaiian Trust Co. v. BorthwickHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Territory v. Ah GoonHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Territory of Hawaii v. MersebergHawaii Supreme Court · 1939
  4. In re Kawahara YasutaroHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Republic of Hawaii v. Li ShaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API