Legal Opinion

In re Kawahara Yasutaro

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ORIGINAL.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

GALBRAITH, J.

Habeas corpus in behalf of Kawahara Yasutaro, Fukushima-Kinasaku and Kubiyama Hirokichi who are alleged to be un*668lawfully restrained of tbeir liberty, being confined in jail at Libue, by J. H. Coney, Sheriff of the Island of Kauai, Territory of Hawaii.

The application for the writ was addressed to the Chief Justice and was issued returnable before the Court.

The return of the sheriff seeks to justify the imprisonment: (1) under authority of “an order of arrest” made by the circuit judge of the Fifth Circuit, in the case of the Territory of Hawaii v. Moritaro…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Comfort v. KittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. State ex rel. Howard v. GraceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  3. Clayborn v. TompkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ex parte ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. In re BritoHawaii Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Justin Alexander Marshall Justin Alexander Marshall v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. Hawaiian Trust Co. v. BorthwickHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  3. In re CraigHawaii Supreme Court · 1911
  4. In the Matter of Justin Alexander Marshall Justin Alexander Marshall v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API